Category Archives: Sanctuary cities

See the Movie ‘America’!

Barack Hussein Obama: ‘Coyote’ In Chief

Frank Antenori: Republicans Must Vote Conservative

logo5By Frank Antenori / Southern Arizona News-Examiner

I was recently invited for coffee by a close friend and fellow Republican to discuss upcoming state legislative races. Well respected in both local grass roots circles as well as the so called “GOP Establishment,” he was chosen to reach out to me in hopes of convincing me to not get involved in several key legislative primaries. However, by the time we finished our second cup of coffee, he would not only fail to convince me to stay silent, but he would instead volunteer to help me in my efforts to inform GOP voters of the threat to our state. It took a simple history lesson to change his mind.

I take you back to the 46th Legislature. In 2004, a handful of so called “pragmatic” Republicans conspired with Democrats to give then Governor Janet Napolitano a budget that would increase state spending by more than $700 million, a 10% increase in spending in a year that saw little inflation (2%).

Worse yet, that budget created a $500 million budget deficit; in violation of Arizona’s Constitution which requires a balanced budget. Rightfully, fiscal conservatives were outraged at what was clearly an irresponsible budget. In response, conservatives recruited fiscally responsible primary opponents to challenge these fiscally irresponsible Republicans.

Then the “GOP Establishment” stepped in. They argued that we risked losing our legislative majorities by running more conservative candidates in the general. Even going as far as saying that even though these “pragmatic” Republicans may have strayed a bit and voted with Democrats for the big spending budget, at least they voted right on things like guns, faith and family issues. They used the old rationale of “even the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat any day.” Generally I would agree with that statement, however, it only holds true if those Republicans support the Republican platform and not the Democrat platform. In 2004, there were 39 Republicans in the House and 17 in the Senate. (In Arizona, you need only control 31 seats in the House and 16 in the Senate to maintain your majority.)

Many of the party faithful bought the establishment’s argument, held their noses and voted for the fiscally irresponsible Republicans “for the good of the Party.” Deep down they hoped these “pragmatic” Republicans would realize the error of their ways and act “more Republican” and fiscally responsible if they got re-elected. As a result, the fiscally conservative challengers were defeated and the “GOP Establishment” candidates got re-elected.

What did voting for the establishment candidate get us? Over the next few years, more and more spending occurred and the budget deficit got bigger, ballooning to over $2.2 billion. Well at least it helped us keep our majorities in the legislature right? Not exactly, in the House the GOP lost six seats and our majority declined to 33 seats; dangerously close to the 31 needed to maintain majority control.

Then in 2008, “Pragmatic Republicans” did it again. Cutting a backroom deal in the dark of night with legislative Democrats and Governor Napolitano, four House and four Senate Republicans essentially voted to put Arizona on the verge of Bankruptcy. They left the State with no money in the Rainy Day Fund and a $3 Billion budget deficit. This time conservatives had enough.

A grassroots groundswell of conservative candidates filed to run for the legislature and challenge the big spenders of both parties. Once again the “GOP Establishment” clamored about “party unity, we’re going to lose our majority if we elect conservatives in the primary, think of the big picture and don’t get hung up on a single budget vote, etc.” This time, despite the GOP establishment spending heavily on their “pragmatic” candidates, the GOP primary voters weren’t going to listen.

Fiscal conservatives won primary after primary, soundly defeating establishment candidates in several key races. Instead of lining up behind the party’s nominees, the GOP establishment instead sided with Democrats by undermining conservative candidates in the general election. Establishment lackey and so called “political consultant” Nathan Sproul even penned an open letter to voters stating “In my opinion, the Republican Nominees are not reflective of the overall electorate.” His statement was quickly picked up by Democrats and used in mailers against conservatives.

Despite the “GOP Establishment’s” efforts to torpedo our candidates, we not only kept our majorities in the State House and Senate, but increased them! Keep in mind this was 2008, the year Barack Obama was elected President. Conventional political wisdom predicted a Democrat landslide nationally and the Tea Party was still more than a year from even coming into existence. Arizona was one of only two states in the whole country that saw Republicans add seats to their legislatures. The GOP Establishment was not only WRONG, they were DEAD WRONG.

Then came 2010; “the year of the Tea Party.” Both Establishment GOP candidates as well as Democrats were steam rolled by conservatives. Republicans obtained “Super majorities” in both houses of the legislature and it immediately led to a balanced budget in Arizona, the first in over five years.

Now we’re back to 2014 and here we go again. A new bunch of so-called “Pragmatic Republicans” have again voted with state Democrats to bring Obamacare to Arizona and once again bust the state’s bank by voting for fiscally irresponsible budgets. Where there was once $1Billion in the Rainy Day fund, now there’s essentially nothing. The budget is once again structurally unbalanced and we’re looking at huge deficits again in 2016 and 2017.

So guess what the “Establishment” is saying. Yep, you guessed it: “Don’t primary them, they only voted ‘wrong’ on Obamacare and the budget, but otherwise, they’re still better than Democrats. Don’t primary them for the ‘good of the party’ and so we don’t lose our majorities.”

Well I for one am not buying it. I’m not going to let history repeat itself. These turncoat Republicans, also known as “Legistraitors,” are causing irreparable damage to our states’ fiscal and economic future and they must go. We can’t let the financial disaster of 2004-2008 happen again. Reelecting these “pragmatic” traitors to the platform will spell fiscal disaster for Arizona. Ask yourself, do you want to go through what we had to go through back in 2009-2011? Huge budget cuts, a sales tax increase, selling our Capitol? Heck no!

For a list of these Legistraitors and their relationship to the Coalition of Corruption that is bankrupting Arizona and bringing failed Washington D.C., big government, policies to our state go to The Alliance of Principled Conservatives website at www.APCArizona.com and click on Primary AZ Legislator.

Frank Antenori is a former Arizona State Senator and GOP congressional candidate. He is a contributing editor to SOAZNEWSX.

Here’s that list of legistraitors who must be defeated in the August primary:

LD25 (S)  Bob Worsley

LD15       Heather Carter

LD8         Frank Pratt

LD8         T.J. Shope

LD16       Doug Coleman

LD28       Katie Brophy McGee

LD18       Rob Robson

LD18 (S)  Jeff Dial

RINO candidates who must be defeated:

LD28    Mary Hamway

LD18    David Phineas

LD23    Effie Carlson

LD23    Bob Littlefield

LD13    Diane Landis  – running against incumbents

LD20    Bill Adams    –  running against incumbents

LD11    Jo Grant

LD14    Susan Syfert  – running against incumbents

LD20 (S) Justin Henry

LD11 (S) Scott Bartle

LD23 (S) Jeff Schwartz

Russell Pearce Returns to Airwaves on Patriot Radio

WHAT: The Russell Pearce Show on 960 The Patriot

WHEN: Saturday,

WHY: Because the Price of Liberty is Eternal Vigilance

REALLY: Yes, Enough is Enough!

Guest:  D.S. Edwards Author of Collective Retribution a look at America’s possible future with unsecured borders

TIME: 7:00PM to 8:00PM

CALLERS? Yes, it’s a live show: 602-508-0960… make your voices heard!

“Arizona’s leading conservative Russell Pearce has returned to the airwaves like a thunderclap, on a bigger station with a bigger show. He’s got the liberals on the run and he means business. This is must-listen radio for conservatives, with every liberal’s worst nightmare at the mike.”

Shows on 960 The Patriot/KKNT typically reach approximately 75,000 – 100,000 listeners each between Monday – Sunday, 6A-12Midnight. The syndicated and established shows naturally pull in higher audiences, as do those in prime/drive times.

The Russell Pearce show is immediately following drive-time, and on the weekend, but we follow an established show, have a host with a large valley/state following, and conduct more online advertising and promotion than any other host on the network. And, based on caller volume, the best indicator of listenership, we’re already approaching the #1 spot on this station and hope to soon be able to again call Senator Pearce Arizona’s #1 conservative talk radio show.

There is no lack of places to spend your money to help good causes.  We have a Republic to save.  I would love and need good sponsors and donations to keep this show going, along with our newsletter and in order to stay on the air, so your help is greatly appreciated. 

First, we’ll have commercial(s) professionally produced for sponsors to run during the show (production costs are included in sponsorship package rates).

Second, Senator Pearce/The Russell Pearce Show does live promos for sponsors during the course of weekly shows, promoting the organizations and businesses which sponsor the show.

Third, we have a show website in development, on which ads of sponsors and advertisers will place prominently displayed with links back to websites, videos, or other promotional pages.

Fourth, we have a partnership with the Conservative Leadership Coalition and the Arizona Conservative Club which operate a Facebook page I developed for them with nearly 40,000 active subscribers, on which we promote our sponsors and the show/show guests.

Fifth, sponsors will be invited to participate live in-studio, or remotely, in shows for the duration of their sponsorship, both for issue advocacy and membership purposes (we wholeheartedly endorse using this program to drive traffic to generate new business for our friends/supporters). And, because we’re a work in progress, we’re always open to working with our friends to make the show more successful for those who support us. We’re the epitome of a small business enterprise, and where we can help our supporters succeed, we’ll go out of our way to do so.

I’ve requested demographic specifics from the station and will send those to you as soon as I get the newest numbers. Our listeners span the entire valley live, and across the entire southwest and several metropolitan centers online already (corresponding to our online marketing efforts).

Our listener call volume already matches that of established shows which have been on the air for several years, which speaks well of Senator Pearce’s popularity and “draw”, and explains how he was able to generate such great listenership volume on his previous show, despite being on a much smaller station.

Presently, sponsorships begin at $500/month with a minimum three month commitment. This includes all of the promotions listed above locked in, including a 30-second commercial run during the show (a 60-second commercial begins at $650/month with all the additional promotions, also with a three-month minimum commitment). We also offer weekday advertising discounted at our rate during the weekday syndicated shows on the Salem Radio Network.

We can certainly modify that amount and work with anyone willing to help and support the Show and our effort to keep critical issues in front of the public and good honest debate on issues facing our great Republic.  We are in the middle of our 2014 election and will be vetting the candidates for all the offices.

Once we’re more established, we’ll start pricing packages out individually (commercials, websites, live show promotions, etc), but for now, we’re offering everything discounted and under one umbrella sponsorship package.

Thanks in advance for your consideration — and please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Thank you for your consideration and support

FAITH – FAMILY-FREEDOM … IN GOD WE TRUST

SENATOR RUSSELL PEARCE

Speaking in Arizona, Jeb Bush Pushes Amnesty

At a prominent conference of education innovators, Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who is considering a 2016 presidential run, called for more guest worker programs and a path to amnesty for all of the country’s illegal immigrants.

Speaking at what is known as the “Davos in the Desert” event in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Monday evening, Bush said the United States needed “robust guest worker programs” and an expansion of H1-B visas for the high-tech industry,” even though the notion that there is a shortage of American high-tech workers has been called a myth. He also called for a “tough but fair path to legalized status” for all of the country’s illegal immigrants and an end to immigration quotas for countries. 

Bush said that it was not an “American value to have 12-13 million people living in the shadows” and spoke about the need to protect borders and sanction companies that may hire illegal immigrants.

He asserted that the “rags to riches rate” in the country is only four percent and that the American Dream is being replaced with “stickiness at both ends,” as those born either wealthy or poor are likely to remain so while the middle class feels the squeeze.

Bush has previously called illegal immigration “an act of love” and said the issue “shouldn’t rile people up.” Establishment Republican guru Karl Rove even conceded that Jeb Bush was not artful in those remarks. At the conference, which was co-hosted by Arizona State University and GSV Advisors, Bush made no reference to those prior comments, though he has previously defended them.

–Breitbart.com

Outing Arizona’s Congressional Communists

By Trevor Loudon, New Zeal BlogSpot, July 27, 2013

Arizona has not one, but three Communist Party affiliated Congress members.

How could a libertarian leaning state like Arizona have any communist affiliated representatives?

Most Arizonans have no idea that Arizona even has a Communist Party local.

Lorenzo Torrez

Lorenzo Torrez

It all started with Lorenzo Torrez (who died in 2012), one of Arizona’s most influential ever politicians. Never heard of him? Neither have 90% of Arizonans.

In 1974, Torrez moved with his family to Tucson where he served as chair of the Arizona Communist Party for more than 30 years. He also led the party’s Chicano Equality Commission and was a member of the CPUSA National Committee.

He built the Arizona CP into an influential organization in all the progressive movements of Arizona.

Torrez helped establish the communist run Salt of the Earth Labor College in Tucson, which continues today.

Steve Valencia, president of the labor college, told the People’s World, “Lorenzo changed the political landscape of Arizona. For him, the liberation of the working class and equality for the Mexican American people were inherently tied together.”

Torrez was also a “pioneer in the struggle for Mexican American political representation,” Valencia added. “I always say: Before Ed Pastor and Raul Grijalva, there was Lorenzo Torrez.”

Pastor and Grijalva are Arizona’s first two Mexican Americans members of the U.S. Congress. But Torrez ran for Congress before they ran, and also ran against Republican Senator Barry Goldwater.

“Lorenzo told us it is time for these majority Latino districts to be represented by a Mexican American,” said Valencia. “He wanted voters to see a Latino name on the ballot.”

When Pastor declared his candidacy, Torrez rallied the Tucson Communist Party club to join in the effort. Pastor’s victory in 1991, set the stage for Grijalva’s election in 2002.

Today, Ed Pastor and Raul Grijalva are members of the far left Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Grijalva was involved with the Communist Party well before 2002, as this article he wrote for the  Party’s People’s World in 1993 proves.

aaaaaaccccckkkk

Both Pastor and Grijalva have been champions of the illegal immigrants “rights” movement – a movement that Lorenzo Torrez helped to found in California and Arizona and then helped to coordinate across the entire Southwest.

The third Arizona Rep. with provable Communist Party ties is Phoenix-based freshman Kyrsten Sinema.

While she likes to pretend moderation these days, Sinema is a hard core leftist with past ties to several extremist groups – including of course the Arizona Communist Party.

Here she is in 2003, putting her name to the Arizona Communist Party’s May Day greetings page – right over that of Lorenzo Torrez and Steve Valencia.

torreziioo

To find out more about Arizona’s communist connected Congress members, read Trevor Loudon’s new book “The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress.”

book1-202x300

The Enemies Within” was released August 20, 2013, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

 

Freedom vs. Control? Whom will You Elect in 2014?

The Arizona Conservative has officially begun tracking candidates for public office in the Grand Canyon State in advance of November‘s elections. Voters have two choices: candidates who will champion FREEDOM for the individual and those who will push policies that deny and reduce personal freedoms — the candidates of socialism and excessive government CONTROL of your life. Whom do you want in office? Those who respect your constitutional freedom, or those who would expand government and take away more and more of your freedom? Your vote will impact every facet of American society and culture.

Office

 

Freedom

 

Control

Governor Andy Thomas, Al Melvin, Frank Riggs Fred DuVal
Secretary of State Will Cardon Chris Campas, Terry Goddard
Attorney General Mark Brnovich Felicia Rotellini
State Treasurer Randy Pullen
Supt. Of Public Instruction John Huppenthal Sharon Thomas, David Garcia
Mining Inspector Joe Hart Manuel Cruz
Congress-District 1 Adam Kwasman Ann Kirkpatrick
Congress-District 2 Martha McSally Ron Barber
Congress-District 3 Gabriela Saucedo Mercer Raul Grijalva
Congress-District 4 Paul Gosar Mikel Weisser
Congress-District 5 Matt Salmon
Congress-District 6 David Schweikert
Congress-District 7 Steve Gallardo, Cedar Chavez
Congress-District 8 Trent Franks Helmuth Hack
Congress-District 9 Vernon Parker, Wendy Rogers, Andrew Walter Kyrsten Sinema
 Arizona Senate-District 25  Ralph Heap  Bob Worsley

Watch for continued updates and additional choices in the weeks and months ahead.

Ann Kirkpatrick Lied about Government Medical Rationing

Left-Stream Media Lament Arpaio Recall Failure

By Tom Blumer, Newsbusters

Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio won’t be subject to a recall  election. It wasn’t even close, though two press reports, one at the  Associated Press and another at the  Los Angeles Times, failed to accurately convey how seriously organizers  failed. Both reports also trotted out an “if only” excuse which doesn’t pass the  stench test, let alone the smell test.

Neither outlet gave an accurate impression of how seriously the recall drive  failed. Organizers needed 335,317 valid signatures, but Stephen Lemons at  the Phoenix New Times (in a “Featured Bastard” report, no  less) reported earlier in the week that the recall movement’s manager  “estimates that the recall now needs 90,000 more signatures to have a cushion in  addition to the 335,317 necessary to force a recall.” In other words, the magic  turn-in number, unreported by both the AP and the Times, was really 425,000 and  change.

The AP’s Jacques Billeaud at  least stuck to only what the recall movement itself claimed, and even  allowed the full effect of Sheriff Joe’s gloating statement into his  dispatch:

“It is a sad day,” recall campaign manager Lilia Alvarez said. “It is a  disappointment.”

Recall organizers won’t reveal the number of signatures they  gathered. In their last update, given five weeks ago, organizers said they had  gathered 200,000 signatures.

“The count at this point doesn’t matter,” Alvarez said in deciding not to  reveal the number of signatures gathered.

Arpaio issued a statement suggesting that recall organizers aren’t  revealing the number of signatures they gathered because they are embarrassed by  the level of their failure. “This effort failed because the good people  of Maricopa County, whom I’m honored to serve, rejected the wrong-headed idea of  overturning an election,” Arpaio said.

But in moves ordinarily expected of AP, the wire service kept Arpaio’s name  out of the headline (“GROUP FAILS IN BID TO RECALL ARIZ. SHERIFF”) and used what  is likely the most  unflattering photo it has in its files to accompany the story. Oh, and  Billeaud made sure to call Arpaio “polarizing” in his opening paragraph — a  tage the press almost never applies to a Democrat or liberal.

At  the Times, Cindy Carcamo allowed someone besides Ms. Alvarez, the campaign’s  director, to throw out a vague number, clipped the gloating element from  Arpaio’s statment, and went into excuse-making mode:

Activists behind the recall effort would not say how many signatures they  were short. Randy Parraz, president of Citizens for Better Arizona, only said  the two groups had collected close to 300,000 signatures.

Arpaio, reelected in November, blasted the group in a prepared  statement.

“After months of name calling, after the disparaging effigies and theatrics … this latest recall effort has failed,” Arpaio said. “This effort failed because  the good people of Maricopa County, whom I’m honored to serve, rejected the  wrongheaded idea of overturning an election.”

The groups had struggled to raise funds necessary to hire paid  signature gatherers — key to these sort of efforts. Instead, the groups  relied heavily on volunteers to gather signatures against the six-term sheriff  who is something of an institution in Arizona’s largest county.

… The groups gained momentum after a federal judge ruled Friday that the  immigration enforcement policies employed by Arpaio violated the  Constitution.

What momentum? Giving Parraz’s apparently unauthorized estimate a huge  benefit of the doubt and calling it 275,000 the recall fell short by at least  37% ([435,000 minus 275,000] divided by 435,000) of what they needed.

The AP’s Billeaud also allowed an excuse-maker into his report:

“I wish from the bottom of my heart that this ruling would have  come out a month earlier. Had this ruling come out a month earlier, who knows  how many signatures we would have gotten,” Democratic state Rep. Martin Quezada  of Avondale, a supporter of the Arpaio recall effort, said.

Maybe a few thousand? Big deal.

ICE Union Sues Obama for Tying Hands of Border Agents

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 149 other followers