The Case against McCain for Senate Re-Election

Big Government Bailouts

McCain also voted for the $850 billion bailout of the big banks, which included $150 billion in pork, proposed a $300 billion bailout for mortgage lenders and, according to the Heritage Foundation, sponsored an amnesty bill in 2007 that would have cost taxpayers $2.6 trillion over the long-term. 

In the fall of 2008, McCain left the campaign trail in a near panic to return to Washington where he voted in favor of a bailout despite significant Republican opposition and concerns expressed at the time.

Below is a list of seven of the top 20 (including the top five) donors to John McCain from 2003-2008 as compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.  It reads like a who’s who of companies that received bailout cash.  In fact, while these companies raised John McCain over $1.7 million, they were bailed out to the tune of some $135 billion

 COMPANY  McCain Donations  Bailout Money
 Merrill Lynch (taken over by Bank of America)  $373,595  (see Bank of America)
 Citigroup Inc  $322,051 $45,000,000,000
 Morgan Stanley        $273,452         $10,000,000,000
 Goldman Sachs  $230, 095  $10,000,000,000
 JPMorgan Chase & Co  $228, 107  $25,000,000,000
 Bank of America  $166,026  $45,000,000,000
 Bear Stearns (taken over by JPMorgan)  $117, 498  (see JPMorgan)
 TOTAL  $1,710,824 $135,000,000,000 


John McCain called the bailout bill an “obscenity,” but voted for it anyway.    It included $150 billion in earmarks.  And just last week in the Arizona Republic, the senior senator from Arizona claims he was duped, seeking to blame others for his bank bailout vote.  He repeated the claim on yesterday’s Meet The Press.  Ironically, he continues to tout his “experience” as to why Arizonans should return him to the Senate.    

Read the story here:

“John McCain likes to talk tough about the bankers at the center of the economic meltdown, but he still kept their cash.  But as we saw with Charlie Keating, when it comes to financial interests McCain appears to have a blind spot,” said Hayworth campaign manager David Payne, “During the economic meltdown in the Fall of 08, Republicans all across America looked to McCain for leadership, but instead they saw a panicky career politician cave to the special interests and ensure Barack Obama’s election.” 

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy

In October of 2006, while participating in MSNBC’s Hardball College Tour, Senator McCain said in response to a question about “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”: “I understand the opposition to it, and I’ve had these debates and discussions, but the day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, senator, we ought to change the policy, then I think we ought to consider seriously changing it because those leaders in the military are the ones we give the responsibility to.” (Emphasis added)

In an interview given this past June to Ana Marie Cox, McCain said this about the policy: “My opinion is shaped by the view of the leaders of the military.”

So when did Senator McCain change his mind about having his mind changed by military leaders?

Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Admiral Robert Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified on Capitol Hill that they think the policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” should come to an end.

And what response did Senator McCain give to these military leaders asking for a change?

“’Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ has been an imperfect, but effective policy. And at this moment when we’re asking more of our military than at any time in recent memory we should not repeal this law.” (Emphasis added)

McCain even went so far as to accuse Secretary Gates of trying to change the policy single-handedly, saying: “I’m happy to say we still have a Congress of the United States that would have to pass a law to repeal ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’, despite your efforts to repeal it, in many respects, by fiat.”

Dissing Senior Citizens

Prior to becoming a 73-year old senior himself McCain derided the well-known retirement community.
“Most of the people coming here are not senior citizens moving to Leisure World, I mean Seizure World, I mean, uh, Sun City…I mentioned Seizure World a moment ago…the last election in 1984, 97% of them came out to vote. I think the other 3% were in intensive care.”

According to a member of the audience, McCain characterized seniors as a group “that makes demands without contributing.” (Source: Casa Grande Dispatch | Casa Grande, Arizona | Friday, June 20, 1986)  

On Amnesty

John McCain refused to listen to over 80% of his constituents and the American public by Co-Sponsoring Amnesty legislation with Senator Kennedy in 2007 that would have turned millions of illegal aliens into US voters. McCain’s Amnesty legislation failed after the Capital phone system collapsed under the pressure of angry calls ranging 50-100 to 1 against his bill.

McCain apologized to and misled Republican voters in the 2008 GOP Primary for President by claiming he had changed his position on Amnesty and after winning the primary, he flip flopped and returned to his prior pro-Amnesty positions, which left many voters feeling they could not trust John McCain.

“So yeah, of course John McCain will get our vote,” said one Ku Klux Klan member in their endorsement

    video for Senator John McCain.  The video can be seen here:   


 “But I’m going Republican and I talked to my guys and most of them are voting for McCain too,” said Ron Edwards.  Edwards is an Imperial Wizard with the Imperial Klans of America.


Social Issues

McCain supports federal funding for destructive embryonic stem cell research – “because Nancy Reagan supports it.” Rated 75 percent by the National Right to Life Committee, indicating a mixed record on abortion. (Dec 2006)

McCain voted against cloture on a federal marriage amendment.

Campaigning in New Hampshire in 2000, McCain said that if his teen-age daughter got pregnant, he would let her make the “choice” on whether or not to abort the child. This is the pro-abortion argument championed by Planned Parenthood and the abortion advocacy.

Big Government Regulations

Senator John McCain’s big government legislation to further regulate vitamins and supplements, hurting consumer choice and small businesses across Arizona.

The legislation sparked outrage throughout Arizona and the country.

Sen. McCain’s partnership with U.S. Senator Byron Dorgan (D-North Dakota) follows other liberal efforts with Joseph Lieberman on global warming, Ted Kennedy on amnesty and Russ Feingold on First Amendment regulations which were recently overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.  

“Use of vitamins and supplements should not be regulated simply because a few athletes want to redirect attention from their doping,” said Hayworth.

This bill is yet more “bipartisan” legislation by the 24-year incumbent that panders to those interested in increasing the size and scope of the federal government.   Senator McCain voted for the massive bank bailout bill in 2008, which included $150 billion in earmarks.  During his presidential run he proposed spending $300 billion to buy up every bad mortgage in America, again bailing out banks and borrowers.  And according to the Heritage Foundation his support for amnesty legislation would have cost taxpayers $2.6trillion.    

Voters to Judge McCain on what He Has Yet to Do

A new video shows Senator McCain saying he is confident that voters will judge him not for what he has done for Arizona during his 28 years in Washington, but bizarrely what he might do for them. That might be a good strategy on the part of Arizona’s senior senator, as the video shows puzzled voters trying to answer the question, “What has Senator McCain done for Arizona?” 

The video, called “McCain on McCain,” was released today by the campaign of JD Hayworth, the conservative challenger to the moderate McCain. 

The video can be seen by clicking here

In the video, Sen. McCain is heard saying that he is confident that the people of Arizona will “…judge me on not what I’ve done for them, but what they think I can do for them.” Most politicians who have spent as many years in the U.S. Senate as McCain has would be expected to run on their record – not their potential. 

Limits on Free Speech


McCain and Democrat Sen. Russ Feingold teamed up to create the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform, placing extreme limits on the freedom of speech during election campaign seasons.


Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization that produced a documentary movie highly critical of then-candidate Hillary Clinton, wanted to distribute the move via video-on-demand technology, and run ads promoting the movie. The FEC ruled that they could not, under the electioneering communications sections of McCain-Feingold, air commercials promoting the movie or distribute the movie via video-on-demand technology. Citizens United appealed, and in June 2009 the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would re-hear oral arguments in the case specifically on the issue of whether they should overturn Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, a 1990 decision permitting bans on independent expenditures in campaigns by corporations and unions. Oral arguments were held on September 9, 2009.

On January 21, 2010 in an unusual special session, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Citizens United. It is a transformative which restores the First Amendment rights of businesses, unions and nonprofit advocacy groups to participate in campaigns. It’s an extraordinary win for free political speech rights by speakers of all stripes.


Gang of 14
“[T]he McCain Gang of 14 was a disaster that snatched defeat from the jaws of victory on judicial nominations.
Wendy Long, Bench Memo, National Review Online, February 5, 2008:


“In May 2005, Senate Republican leadership had worked for months to make sure they had the votes for the constitutional option. We were ready to put an end to judicial filibusters that liberals had used to kill great nominations.

“And then Senator McCain and his Gang of 14 arrogated the power to their little clique to determine what nominees would make it and what nominees would not, based on a subjective and undefined standard.

Michael Gaynor, Renew America, February 6, 2008


“I don’t know much about economics.” FactCheck: Said–then denied–he needed economics education. (Jan 2008)


Skipped voting against a government-funded Woodstock museum.

2000: Criticized Bush’s withdrawal from the Kyoto Treaty. (Jan 2004)

1st Republican to sign onto reducing GHGS. (May 2002)

Voted YES on banning drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (Mar 2005)

Voted NO on Bush Administration Energy Policy. (Jul 2003)

Voted YES on removing consideration of drilling ANWR from budget bill. (Mar 2003)

Voted NO on drilling ANWR on national security grounds. (Apr 2002)

Voted NO on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months. (Mar 2002)

24 thoughts on “The Case against McCain for Senate Re-Election

  1. Pingback: Issue & Argument: Why McCain Must Go « Furthermore


  3. Pingback: The Case against McCain for Senate Re-Election

  4. Mohave Countian currently in Iraq,let’s send John,Cindy,Megan all to Sedona for a long deserved Rest…28 years is enuff…………

  5. Dan Scott

    Are You Scheduled For Government Interrogation If Senate bill 3081 Is Passed?

    How might Americans respond should Government use this bill to take away their loved ones, family members and friends on mere suspicion?

    On March 4, 2010, Sen. John McCain introduced S. 3081, The “Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010.”

    Under S.3081, an “individual” need only be Suspected by Government of “suspicious activity” or “supporting hostilities” to be dragged off and held indefinitely in Military Custody. Government will have the power to detain and interrogate any individual without probable cause. Government need only allege an individual kept in detention, is an Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent suspected of; having engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. How could one prove to Government they did not purposely do something? “Materially Supporting Hostilities” against the United States could include any person or group that spoke out or demonstrated disapproval against an agency of U.S. Government. McCain’s bill has the potential of spawning domestic terrorism in the United States. Consider how Americans might respond should Government use this bill to take away their loved ones, family members and friends on mere suspicion. It is foreseeable many Americans might go underground to Resist Government Tyranny. Definition for Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent: (Anyone Subject to a Military Commission)

    At least under the Patriot Act, law enforcement generally needed probable cause to detain a person indefinitely. Passage of S.3081 will permit government to use mere suspicion to curtail an individual’s Constitutional Protections against unlawful arrest, detention and interrogation without benefit of legal counsel and trial. According to S.3081 Government is not required to provide detained individuals U.S. Miranda Warnings or even an attorney.

    Similar to fascist laws in other countries, S.3081 if passed will frighten Americans from speaking out. S.3081 is so broadly written, it appears any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or an entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners might be detained on the basis he or she is an “unprivileged enemy belligerent”, “supporting hostilities against U.S. Government.”

    See McCain Senate bill S.3081 at:

    FYI: below is enclosed a copy of “Hitler’s Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933.” Although the Nazi Decrees are written differently than S.3081, the McCain bill could bring America to the same place trashing free speech and personal liberty. Note how the Nazi Government in Section (1) and (4), similar to U.S. S.3081, suspend personal liberty— shutdown Free Speech to intimidate Citizens speaking out against Government:

    See Section 1

    “Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.”

    Similar to McCain’s S. 3081, but using different wording the Nazi Government in Section (4) see below, suspended Constitutional rights, ordering the arrest of Citizens for any Act that might incite or provoke disobedience against state authorities. McCain’s S. 3081 instead mentions detaining and prosecuting Individuals for “supporting hostilities” against U.S. Government. S.3081 is so broadly written anti-war protesters Tea Party Groups might be arrested and detained just for attending demonstrations.

    See Section 4

    Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.

    Some members in the Obama Government appear bent on curtailing Citizens’ rights especially Free Speech and Opinions. In the run up to Sen. McCain’s introduced S. 3081, it was reported Top Obama Czar Cass Sunstein Proposed Infiltrating all ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ in a paper prepared in 2008—that apparently expressed: Government should infiltrate and spy on Americans, their groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government. See news story:

    In 2007 perhaps coincidence: “The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act”, was introduced by Rep. Jane Harman. The bill appeared to mirror a number of Czar Cass Sunstein’s subsequent spying proposals on lawful Citizens and interrupting groups without evidence of wrongdoing. Harman’s bill called for investigating and tracking Americans and groups that might be prone to supporting or committing violent acts of domestic terrorism. Harman’s bill had the potential of driving lawful political and other activists underground. Perhaps creating the domestic terrorists Bush II said Americans needed to be protected from. Rep. Harman’s “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” when closely examined, defined “homegrown terrorism” as “any planned act” that might use force to coerce U.S. Government or its people to promote or accomplish a “political or social objective.” No actual force need occur. Government would only need to allege an individual or group thought about it. Rep. Harman’s bill was often called the “Thought Crimes Bill.” The bill failed to pass after Americans became angry upon leaning about it. It is believed but not confirmed a Rand Corporation study provided input to the development of Rep. Jane Harman’s ” Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act.

    McCain’s S.3081 like Harman’s bill, mentions “non-violent acts” supporting terrorism in the U.S. and or emanating from America against a foreign government or “U.S. ally.” “Non-violent terrorist acts” are covered in the Patriot Act to prosecute Persons that support “coercion to influence a government or intimidation to affect a civilian population.” However U.S. activists and individuals under S.3081 would be much more vulnerable to prosecution, if (charged with suspicion) of “intentionally providing support to an Act of Terrorism”, for example American activists cannot control what other activists might do illegally they network with domestically or overseas. Under the Patriot Act, law enforcement generally needs probable cause to detain or prosecute someone. But under S.3081, law enforcement and the military can too easily use “hearsay” or informants to allege “suspicious activity” to detain an individual.

    Since 9/11 federal government established across the nation a large number of Fusion Centers. Fusion Centers were originally established to improve the sharing of anti-terrorism intelligence among different state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. (But since expanded to pursue all crimes and hazards); considering that: it is problematic under S.3081 that detained individuals in the U.S. not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel will be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while in military custody.

    Fusion Centers now pursue for analysis not just criminal and terrorist information, but any information that can be derived from police, public records and private sector data about Americans. Fusion Centers increasingly involve components of the U.S. Military in addition to other government entities to spy on Citizens. The centers heavily rely on local “informants” for information that is shared with Local, State, and Federal police agencies.); “historically” it is foreseeable under S.3081 erroneous informant information will be used to detain innocent Individuals. Other governments have used lying informants to imprison and execute their political opposition. Recently the Department of Homeland Security began sharing more classified Military information with local Fusion Centers, perhaps a mistake, not all local police keep secrets.

    Fusion Centers circumvent Fourth Amendment Constitutional protections that prohibit illegal search and seizure, by taking advantage of ambiguous lines of authority to manipulate differences in federal, state and local laws to maximize information collection. Increasingly (private security companies and their operatives) work so closely with local/federal law enforcement and Fusion Centers—providing and exchanging information about Americans, they appear to (merge) with police. That is what happened in Germany during the 1930’s when a private-Gestapo merged its operations with German Federal Police. Subsequently Germany in 1939 placed all German Police agencies including the Gestapo under the control of the “Reich Main Security Office” the equivalent of U.S. Homeland Security. Notably, McCain’s S.3081 mandates merging Federal, State and Local police and subsequently the U.S. Military to detain and hold Individuals in the U.S., even without probable cause. Interestingly a Rand Report prepared for the Army, recently made public, appears to suggest that U.S. Government develop a Local, State and Federal U.S. “National Police Stabilization Force merging State law enforcement with the Feds. What could happen to State Rights and what Laws and Jurisdiction would be used to prosecute state Citizens arrested by a National Police Stabilization Force? A National Police Force could potentially be sent by the President into any State with the approval of its governor, against the wishes of its Citizens? To clarify the Rand Corporation report visit:

    It should be expected under S.3081 that government would use an individual’s phone call and email information to allege without probable cause “suspicious or hostile activity against the United States.” It does not appear U.S. Government will stop wiretapping Citizens’ electronic communications. Just recently Pres. Obama’s signed Executive Order EO 12425 that put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution. Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure laws. It would appear INTERPOL may now tap American phones and emails without a warrant. And that U.S. Police can use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to arrest Americans and or forfeit their property by bringing INTERPOL into a criminal or civil investigation. Government can too easily take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege “suspicious activity” or that a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or Civil Asset Forfeiture.


    Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7

    In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:

    Section 1
    Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.

    Section 2
    If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.

    Section 4
    Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.

    Who ever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.

    Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.

    Section 5
    The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).

    Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:

    1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;

    Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;

    3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.

    Section 6

    This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.

    Reich President
    Reich Chancellor
    Reich Minister of the Interior
    Reich Minister of Justice

  6. Pingback: Democrat Insists New Healthcare Law Doesn’t Force People to Buy Insurance « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  7. Pingback: Clinton Calls ‘Tea Party’ Movement Bigger Threat than Al-Qaeda « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  8. Pingback: Goldman Sachs Scandal May Impugn President « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  9. Pingback: Bill Would Expand Government Surveillance of Banking Transactions « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  10. Pingback: California Latino Students Protest ‘Lack of Respect’ « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  11. Barry Rolison


    Please, please do not return this flip-flopping RINO to the senate. He has poked his finger in the eye of conservatives for long enough. Send him home……….. or better yet, put him on the border he has refused to support defending!

  12. Ruiza

    To the citizen who no longer owns the fruits of his own labor, the right to complain makes him no less a slave.

    I have always wondered why an Independent voter would fall, for the same sneaky character flaws: in political candidates.

    Could it be a character flaw in us…? Is it a defect in them…? On the other hand, it could be a combination of both….

    Case and point: George Bush Sr. coined the phrase ’The New World Order” to support a Rockefeller agenda.

    His son, George Bush slaved us by socializing the government.
    With his bail out of A I G, he gave away trillions to the Socialist, Elitist, Super-Rich around the world, a despicably squandering of the freedoms of our children and grandchildren without even batting and eye.

    He socialized Banking Institutions the Hank Paulson Mafia way. By arm-twisting all banks to take bail out money or else.

    Jeb Bush, the other Bush has repeated an Obama slogan, “The Reagan Era is over”.

    Now we hear the slogan, “A Conservative Victory in 2010”.

    It sounds like a republican advertisement for a fire sale. Telling us to shop with our votes, at their franchised country store, because it is the socialist store, in which we are one of the franchisees.

    Slogans are euphoric phrases that dull our ability to think clearly or to inspire any common sense. Specially, when rushed to choose a candidate for this franchised smoke filled socialist government. During its smoke filled conservative by-annual voting clearance sale.

    Who do these cretins think we are?

    The Republican party wants you to forget that Juan McCain, Lindsay Graham and George Bush, did expand the links in the chains of American Socialism, with big government spending and the belittling of the Constitution, as much as the Democrat party‘s, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed.

    George Bush and Barack Obama awoke most of us from our conservative daze.

    The Tea Party Members and the Independent voter have to come to accept the fact of political live.

    There are no conservatives in the Republican Party!

    Except for Republican-Libertarian, whom are the only red, white and blue politicians left in America, and consult the Constitutionality of legislation before even considering voting for it, no matter which socialist posse, presented it!

    Conservatives are a myth, a republican fraud as proven by the Bush family.

    Don’t you get it, both parties work for global socialism, and George Bush and Dick Chaney sold the US government as a Socialist Franchise on your behave, at a loss… in a big, red, fire TARP sale.

    The new slave traders are global socialists and the restraining links in the chains are the National Debt and your share of the tax burden.

    I will only vote for validated Republican-Libertarians, Libertarian-Republicans, Constitutionalists or Libertarians or for none of the parasites above.

    The Libertarians are the real enemies of American Socialism!

    With all their faults, they are the only ones standing proud of being traditional Americans and waving the Gadsden flag of freedom.

    The dems. and reps. have been playing Constitutional musical chairs with the Independent voters and we need to accept that most of the Constitutional chair have been taken away from us, by both political parties.

    The government was set to protect man from criminals “and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government“
    Ayn Rand

    To the citizen who no longer owns the fruits of his own labor, the right to complain makes him no less a slave.

  13. Pingback: President Wants LeBron James to Sign with Bulls « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  14. Pingback: Democrat Says Republicans ‘Unfit to Rule America’ « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  15. Pingback: Massachusetts Senate Kills GOP Effort to Block Aid to Illegals « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  16. Pingback: Angry Obama Outlines Oil Spill Strategy « The Arizona Conservative Blog

  17. Pingback: President Defends Delay in Approach to Gulf Oil Spill « Arizona Sunlight

  18. Pingback: Democrat Poll Bad News for the President and Party « Arizona Sunlight

  19. Pingback: Administration Denies ‘Bad Faith’ on Abortion « Arizona Sunlight

  20. Pingback: Hispanic Caucus Wants Illegals to Be Covered by Obamacare « Arizona Sunlight

  21. Pingback: Obama Position on WikiLeaks Explained « Arizona Sunlight

  22. Pingback: Left Initiates Campaign against Tea Party « Arizona Sunlight

  23. Pingback: Dems Come out Swinging on Behalf of Ground Zero Mosque « Arizona Sunlight

  24. Pingback: fess parker santa barbara

Leave a Reply